Contents
Executive Summary
Conclusions
Mindcraft
Certification
Analysis
Methodology
Configuration
iLOAD MVP
AuthMark
Disclosure
Securant Technologies Inc. sponsored
the testing in this report. Mindcraft, Inc. conducted
the performance tests described in this report at
Sun’s Enterprise Technology Center in Menlo Park,
California.
Acknowledgement
We thank Sun for providing the systems
used for the tests and the support staff who helped
configure the servers.
|
ClearTrust Version
4.2 Delivers 45,767 Logins per Minute for
1,000,000 Users and Easily Scales to 5,000,000 Users
ClearTrust provides the highest login performance of any product we have tested to date. Its
performance scales exceptionally well as more CPUs and
Authorizer systems are added to support ClearTrust. In
addition, ClearTrust delivered nearly the identical
performance with a single CPU Authorizer system when we
increased the number of users in the ClearTrust database
from 1,000,000 to 5,000,000.
Mindcraft®
tested the performance of Securant’s ClearTrust™
Version 4.2 running on Sun Enterprise 450 servers. For
these tests we used Mindcraft’s iLOAD MVP™ test
tool running the AuthMark™ Benchmark
Login Scenario. This tool simulated users logging into
Web servers. A login is the combination of one user
authentication and one authorization for access to a
resource (a file in our case). The tests were
done using two different user database sizes: one with 1,000,000 users and the other with
5,000,000 users. All tests were done without caching in
the ClearTrust Web server plug-in to show its worst-case
login performance for 10% of the users in the
database getting one file each. The Result Analysis section in the second part of this white
paper explains the benchmark results.
In ClearTrust, the Authorizer is the central control
point for all authentication and authorization. Our
tests were structured to push the Authorizer system(s)
as close as possible to 100% CPU utilization. Table 1 summarizes, for a 1,000,000
user database, the
number of logins measured per minute and per second as a
function of the ClearTrust Authorizer system(s) configuration. The Scaling Factor in
Table 1 shows how much faster a configuration is
compared to a single authorizer system having one CPU.
Table 1: ClearTrust Login Performance
Scalability - 1,000,000 User Database
1 system, 1
CPU
|
391
|
23,445 |
- |
1 system, 2
CPUs
|
630
|
37,783 |
1.61 |
2 systems, 1
CPU
|
763
|
45,767 |
1.95 |
Figure 1 shows
ClearTrust's performance from Table 1.
Figure
1: ClearTrust Login Scalability for a 1,000,000 User
Database

Table 2 compares the
performance of ClearTrust with a 5,000,000 user database
to that with a 1,000,000 user database. The test results
show that ClearTrust's performance is nearly independent
of the number of users in its database for at least
5,000,000 users. The
Scaling Factor in Table 2 shows performance relative to
the test with a 1,000,000 user database.
Table 2: ClearTrust Login Performance
Scalability
1,000,000 and 5,000,000 User Database
1,000,000 users
1 system, 1 CPU
|
391
|
23,445 |
- |
5,000,000 users
1 system, 1 CPU
|
370 |
22,216 |
0.95 |
Figure 2 shows
ClearTrust's performance from Table 2.
Figure
2: ClearTrust Login Scalability for a 1,000,000 and
5,000,000 User Database

The benchmark results lead us to
conclude that:
- ClearTrust performance almost doubled when we
doubled the number of Authorizer systems.
- When another CPU is added to a ClearTrust
Authorizer system, performance scales
exceedingly well.
- ClearTrust delivers high login performance that is nearly independent of the
number of users in its database through at least
5,000,000 users.
Mindcraft certifies that the results reported
accurately represent the performance of ClearTrust
running on Sun Enterprise servers configured as
specified herein and as measured by AuthMark benchmark.
Our test results should be reproducible by others
using the same test lab configuration, the same Sun
server configurations, and the same software
configurations documented in this white paper.
Analysis
and Test Details
NOTICE:
The information in this publication is
subject to change without notice.
MINDCRAFT, INC. SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ERRORS OR
OMISSIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, NOR FOR INCIDENTAL OR
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE FURNISHING,
PERFORMANCE, OR USE OF THIS MATERIAL.
This publication does not constitute
an endorsement of the product or products that were
tested. This test is not a determination of product
quality or correctness, nor does it ensure compliance
with any federal, state or local requirements.
|