Contents
Executive Summary
Conclusions
Mindcraft
Certification
Analysis
Methodology
Configuration
iLOAD MVP
AuthMark
Disclosure
Oblix Inc. sponsored
the testing in this report. Mindcraft, Inc. conducted
the performance tests described in this report at
Sun’s test lab in Menlo Park,
California.
Acknowledgement
We thank Sun for providing the systems
used for the tests and the support staff who helped
configure the servers.
|
Oblix NetPoint 4.0 delivers
103,200 logins per minute and 16,260 Extranet
Sequences (178,860 operations) per minute for
1,000,000 users while demonstrating great scalability
Oblix NetPoint delivers the best login and Extranet performance of any product we have tested to date.
In addition, NetPoint's performance scales exceptionally well as more CPUs
are added to each Access Server and as more Access
Servers are used.
Mindcraft®
tested the performance of Oblix NetPoint 4.0 running on Sun Enterprise 450
servers. For these tests, we used Mindcraft’s iLOAD MVP™ test
tool running the AuthMark™
Login and Extranet Scenarios. These test scenarios
simulate users accessing protected resources via Web servers. All tests were
done using a 1,000,000-user directory.
Login Scenario
The Login Scenario measures the combination of one user
authentication and one authorization for access to a
resource (called a Login). The Result Analysis section in the
second part of this white
paper explains the benchmark results.
The NetPoint Access Server is the control
point for all authentication and authorization. Our
tests were structured to push the Access Server systems
as close as possible to 100% CPU utilization. Table 1
summarizes the Login Scenario performance as a
function of the NetPoint Access Server system(s) configuration. The Scaling Factor in
Table 1 shows how much faster a configuration is
compared to a single system with one CPU using one
directory server, the smallest configuration.
Table 1: NetPoint Login Performance
Scalability - 1,000,000 User Database
472
|
28,320 |
Baseline |
1 system, 1
CPU
|
1
|
474
|
28,440 |
1.0 |
1 system, 1
CPU
|
2
|
827
|
49,620 |
1.8 |
1 system, 2
CPUs
|
1
|
834
|
50,040 |
1.8 |
1 system, 2
CPUs
|
2
|
932
|
55,920 |
2.0 |
2 systems, 1
CPU
|
2
|
986
|
59,160 |
2.1 |
1 system, 3 CPUs
|
1
|
1,135
|
68,100 |
2.4 |
1 system, 3 CPUs
|
2
|
1,547
|
92,820 |
3.3 |
2 systems, 2 CPUs
|
2
|
1,720*
|
103,200* |
3.6* |
2 systems, 3 CPUs
|
2
|
* - There were not enough Web servers available in
the lab to fully utilize the CPUs in the NetPoint Access
Servers.
Figure 1 shows NetPoint's performance from Table
1 by server configuration.
Figure
1: NetPoint Login Scalability for a 1,000,000 User
Database

Extranet Scenario
The Extranet Scenario
measures the combination of one user authentication and
10 authorizations for access to resources (these 11 operations
constitute one Extranet sequence). Table 2 compares the NetPoint
Extranet Scenario performance to that of the Login
Scenario for the same
hardware configuration - two Access Servers each having one
CPU and two directory servers. The results in
Table 2 demonstrate that the NetPoint Access Server
performs authorizations 60% faster than authentications. The Extranet Scenario, because it uses
a more realistic mix of operations than the Login
Scenario, provides a better basis for capacity planning
purposes.
Table 2: NetPoint Extranet and Login
Performance
- 2 Access Servers, 1 CPU Each
Authentications/minute
|
16,260 |
55,920
|
Authorizations/minute
|
162,600 |
55,920 |
Total
operations/minute
|
178,860 |
111,840 |
The benchmark results lead us to
conclude that:
- Oblix NetPoint delivers the best login and Extranet performance of any product we have tested to date.
- NetPoint's authentication performance scales almost linearly
with the number of CPUs and Access Servers.
- NetPoint's authorization performance is
outstanding, exceeding its authentication
performance by 60%.
Mindcraft certifies that the results reported
accurately represent the performance of Oblix NetPoint
4.0 running on Sun Enterprise servers configured as
specified herein and as measured by AuthMark benchmark.
Our test results should be reproducible by others
using the same test lab configuration, the same Sun
server configurations, and the same software
configurations documented in this white paper.
Analysis
and Test Details
NOTICE:
The information in this publication is
subject to change without notice.
MINDCRAFT, INC. SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ERRORS OR
OMISSIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, NOR FOR INCIDENTAL OR
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE FURNISHING,
PERFORMANCE, OR USE OF THIS MATERIAL.
This publication does not constitute
an endorsement of the product or products that were
tested. This test is not a determination of product
quality or correctness, nor does it ensure compliance
with any federal, state or local requirements.
|